From first to tenth
Acréscimo (Portugal)
A civic and nonprofit organization whose purpose is to promote sustainable and socially responsible forestry investments.. This blog expresses our views on forest management and trade of forest products from Portugal.
December 15, 2016
November 20, 2016
May 3, 2016
5 reasons for being suspicious about the forest certification systems FSC and PEFC
In the latest years, Acréscimo has been noticing more and more reasons to be suspicions about the credibility of forest certification based on the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Endorsement of Forest Certification Program (PEFC) systems, the way they operate in Portugal.
1. Due to the complicity with unrestrained deforestation
situation and uncontrolled spread of exotic species plantations, with high
environmental, social and economic risks;
2. Due to the suspected absence of permanent monitoring in the deposition
of industrial waste
in certified forest areas with potential risks to public health, especially to
the rural populations;
3. Due to the association, on the chain of custody, to entities
involved on public complaint for breach of environmental legislation, with
serious situations related to an international river course pollution;
4. Due to the predisposition to take advantage of public funding support
through the Common Agricultural Policy and the National Budget (PDR 2020), including the
Permanent Forest Fund, to overcome their tenuous expansion in markets under
imperfect competition;
5. Due to the lack of transparency on the funding model mechanisms of its
activities, especially on the financial flows, directly or indirectly related
to demand of industrial oligopolies.
Acréscimo considers that the FSC and
PEFC certification systems, such as currently applied in Portugal, are shrouded
in suspicions that undermine their credibility. Everything leads us to believe
that the certification business outstripped the principles underlying the
certification.
Acréscimo will question these certification systems international administrations about the credibility
of the actions of its partners in Portugal.
April 27, 2016
Celtejo, environmental crimes and certification
According to public denounce, Celtejo assumes that
fails to meet one of the fundamental parameters of the attributed environmental
license: the parameter related to oxygen, essential for life. The complaint
alleges the practice of environmental crime in the Tejo River, through illegal
industrial waste discharges.
Celtejo – Empresa de Celulose do Tejo S.A. is a company that
belongs to the universe of the Altri
Group, which produces bleached eucalyptus pulp of BEKP type (Bleached
Eucalyptus Kraft Pulp)
Celtejo has chain of responsibility certification, issued by the FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) and PEFC (Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification), by the certifying entity APCER.
The forestry chain of responsibility certification requires full compliance
with the laws, necessarily including compliance with the conditions of the
license awarded by the Portuguese authorities.
This company has also a certification
under ISO
14001: 2015.
The complaint was issued by public
television channel in Portugal, RTP, on "Sexta às 9", and it’s also
available on the broadcaster website
Acréscimo believes that certifications attributed to Celtejo should not be considered valid, given the denunciation of major non-conformity, requiring international audits and re-evaluation, either by the FSC, PEFC and ISO.
April 18, 2016
The credibility of forest certification in Portugal
The successful achievement of sustainable forest
management (SFM) is vital to Portugal, an uncontrolled case of deforestation in
Europe.
Forest certification (FC) is a market tool that claims to
be based on recognition of SFM.
But, how can FC business coexist with deforestation in
Europe?
In Portugal, some
family-owners and some of their organizations perform an extra effort to
implement SFM on their properties, particularly in forest management groups, investing
in is external recognition namely by CF. However, they represent less than 50%
of the total area certified in the country.
Recently,
certification systems operating in Portugal, as the Forest Stewardship Council
(FSC) and the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC),
intend to move towards regional certification level. More than that: for this
purpose, they would like to use public support, integrated within the Common
Agricultural Policy (CAP), distorting the principles they should be based on.
That is, they want to overcome the outdated poor adherence to this tool - on
markets operating in imperfect competition - by the direct support financed by
taxpayers. Taxpayers, so, run into the risk of financing an alleged
double-charged “transparent” business:
as taxpayers and as consumers.
The coexistence of FC
systems with a deforestation situation under no control in Portugal is striking. The country has lost,
in a quarter-century, more than one quarter million hectares of its forest
area. In annual average, it is the equivalent of Lisbon area - 10 thousand
hectares per year, since 1990.
Breaches to the Basic
Law, the National Forest Strategy and the international commitments assumed by
Portugal, in the field of Sustainable Development and of Climate Change and
Global Warming, are statistically and successively notorious. The fact is
revealed by United Nations (FAO), Eurostat and European Environment Agency
reports. But none of them seems to be taken into consideration when one intends
to enable the business of FC.
The entities in
Portugal, representing FSC and PEFC, have a strong financial dependence of
entities that support markets operating through imperfect competition in the
country. Portugal has with strong focus on demand, where supply is
characterized by 98.4% of the forests under non-public management - more than
80% family-owned. However, that too seems irrelevant to the support of FC
business. Even though this market model has been leading to strong consequences
in terms of destruction of natural resources, the depreciation of the
territory, as the catastrophic spread of forest fires (where the country stands
out internationally) and the proliferation of uncontrolled pests and diseases.
The question that arises is whether, at international
level, either the FSC or PEFC are colluding with the situation of deforestation
in Portugal. Apparently they are! Then, their internal and international
credibility would be questionable too!
Isn´t the feasibility of FC, as a business,
overlapping the transparency that should be transmitted to the markets?
Is this not an instrument based on hypocrisy?
April 17, 2016
September 23, 2014
Tetra Pak, Ikea and Kingfisher initiative to evaluate the impact of FSC forest certification
Acréscimo welcomes the announcement
by Tetra Pak, Ikea and Kingfisher regarding the group initiative to evaluate
and clarify the role of FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) on forest
certification.
For a year, Acréscimo has
been requesting to go through technical visits on places where industrial
wastes have been disposed on certified forests soils, managed by pulp and paper
companies. This has not been authorized yet.
Although being in Portugal
for over a decade, the evidence of of the waste disposal motorization
in certified forests has not been part of the agenda in the Audits performed
under the FSC schemes.
In addition to the environmental impacts associated
with this practice, the consequences of industrial waste application on forest
soils can contribute harmful for public health.
Despite of the customers’
benefits of purchasing products from certified forest, the main question is
that FSC has not given assurances regarding the monitoring of potential
impacts associated with the application of waste on the forests it certifies,
especially on forests managed or owned by industrial groups who also produces
such waste.
FSC expresses great weakness in its performance in Portugal. This attitude generates strong doubts about its commitment regarding the goals and standards that the system itself has defined. It should be noted that these industry groups represent more than 70% of forests certified by the FSC system in Portugal. Will there be here any “protection” to its customers?
Even being in Portugal for
many years, only recently - after the intervention of Acréscimo - FSC Portugal
claimed it has initiate the motorization of waste application on certified
forests. However, this unique action is clearly insufficient. The issue, in
accordance with the FSC International, requires continuous monitoring
applications, right from the moment FSC certifies the entities (2007) that
practice application of residues on soils under their management.
To be consistent with the
objectives and guarantees that it claims to support before the Society, FSC
must ensure the existence of instruments for continuous monitoring certified
forest areas, subject of to the application of municipal and industrial waste.
Its actions must be supported by scientific knowledge produced by independent
entities, based on national ecosystems. That does not happen today.
With the announced increase
of industrial capacity in paper industry in Portugal, the pressure on FSC is
definitely assured.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)