A civic and nonprofit organization whose purpose is to promote sustainable and socially responsible forestry investments.. This blog expresses our views on forest management and trade of forest products from Portugal.
April 10, 2014
March 19, 2014
European taxpayers will fund new eucalyptus plantations in Portugal
The Portuguese government proposal. to
submit to the European Commission for grant support from the Common
Agricultural Policy (CAP) to forests in Portugal, is intended to include public
funding for investment in eucalyptus plantations on the pulp and paper industry.
In 2005, Portugal had the fifth largest area
of eucalyptus in the world, exceeding Australia - the origin country of this
species. Between 2005 and 2010 this area has increased more than 26 thousand
hectares.
Over the past 30 years, the area of
eucalyptus in Portugal increased tenfold (10x), however, the average yield
per hectare registers, nowadays, values already achieved in 1928. The focus
of the pulp industry and paper sector has been developed in quantity, the mass
area, not in quality, productivity per hectare.
Eucalyptus areas in Portugal are private,
with significant impact on of Central and Northern regions, characterized by
properties of less than 5 acres and owners have little or no negotiation power.
Besides that, the pulp and paper cluster
is characterized by loose-win relationships, acting in imperfect competition,
with the unilateral imposition of price forestry.
Organizations of forest owners have been
characterized more by a performance of broadcasting public policy and less by
defending the interests of their members. The analysis of the net
entrepreneurial evolution income in forestry over the last decade is
self-explanatory.
On the other hand, the authorities have
refrained from making a systematic monitoring of markets, allowing industry
free operation.
What are the risks then?
Forest fires in Portugal have assumed
contours of national catastrophe. Their progress on the ground derives from the
lack of proper forest management practices. This lack stems essentially from
weak or no prospects for business in the forest. When revenue is uncertain, practices
are reduced to a minimum expense on forested areas, as we'll see.
Encourage the cultivation of more land
without ensuring the viability of forestry business is a gamble of very high
economic risk, but also social and environmental danger.
What we know of the past?
Despite of the billions spent in the last
27 years in Portugal, under the CAP in forestry investment, the economic
situation of forestry deteriorated significantly, with accessories impacts at environmental
and social levels.
Two examples of 27 years of the CAP
support to forests in Portugal:
- According to information from the
national forest authority, the forest species that most benefited from public
support, maritime pine, record this period of time a significant regression in
area and volume; and,
- The second species which received more
public support, the cork oak, registered practically only a maintenance of the
cultivated area, but with loss of quality in the product, cork.
Where was gone the moneys collected from
taxes of national and European taxpayers?
The focus of the Portuguese government, for public
funding to be provided for 2014/2020, still requires the efforts of taxpayers
to benefit the forest industry strategies, out of step with forests. This time,
the government wants to extend this effort to benefit the financial affairs of
the pulp and paper industry. The future impact of this bet can be invaluable,
especially if the expected climate changes on the environmental sphere are not
minimized. At the southern European level, these changes may generate more and
larger forest fires, and the main cause continues to be neglected: the lack of
prospects for sustained, sustainable and socially responsible business in the
forests in Portugal.
November 7, 2013
Are the European taxpayers unintentionally promoting forest fires in Portugal?
Acréscimo
is a non-governmental organization created to promote forestry investments in
accordance with the concept of sustainable development and social
responsibility principles.
As Portuguese
Government prepares another Rural Development Program (RDP) for the period
2014-2020, we question the results of those previous 25 years of the Common
Agricultural Policy (CAP) in Portuguese forests.
What
are we missing?
Acréscimo
is could not find any evaluation study about the CAP funds application
to forests in Portugal. The main question is: in consequence of these funds
application on forests, how much of this investment was reverted effectively in
adding economic, environment and social values?
On
last June, Acréscimo questioned the Ministry of Agriculture in Portugal, regarding
on the statistics related to afforestation in the last 25 years. Acréscimo
also asked for the public information about forest investments – co-financed by
the CAP – detailed by tree species and areas (hectares). Until November, no
feed-back was received. Not even a link to access the data requested, that
should be public and available information.
What
do we suspect?
In
the absence of concrete data, we suppose that the results related to the
forestry measures using CAP funds in Portugal had no significant positive impacts
to the Society, nor economic neither social nor environmental.
Worse,
we suspect of the cyclic application of public funds in local cyclically
affected by forest fires in the last 25 years.
What do we know?
On despite
of the implementation of hundreds of millions of Euros of public support in
Portuguese forests, we know that the weight of the gross value added (GVA) to
forestry declined over 66% in 2010 compared to 1990, compared to the national
GVA. We also know that the weight of the forestry sector (the set of forestry
and forest-based industries) in Portuguese GDP fell down 40% between 2000 and
2010.
Source: INE, CES 2011. Lisbon, 2012.
We
also know that the forest species that has enjoyed more support - the maritime pine
- experienced the retreat in its area of about 400 hectares in the last 25
years. This occurred in despite of the nearly 700 million of public funds
applied. This amount could have boosted about 350 thousand hectares of new
afforestation with this species.
Unfortunately,
we know that the application of hundreds of millions of Euros of CAP funds will
not minimize the cycle of destruction caused by forest fires in Portugal, which
currently has similar impact to what it had in the mid 90s.
Forest Fires - Burned Areas 1980/2012
(red line - wooded areas
/ yellow - uncultivated areas / black - total burned area)
Source: ICNF. Lisbon, 2013)
Questions that may arise:
What
is the real destination of hundreds of millions of Euros of public support that
should create value in forests, ensuring employment and welfare to Society and
protect Nature?
Are
the European taxpayers unintentionally promoting forest fires in Portugal?
What measures of forest policy
(beyond the RDP 2014/2020) has the Portuguese Government prepared to counter
the progressive decline of forestry in Portugal? 90% of the forest areas in
Portugal are owned by hundreds of thousands of families and rural communities,
the vast majority undercapitalized and more than 60% of cases with properties
up to 5 hectares. The forest product markets are characterized by loose-win
relationship, where prices are generally imposed by the forest-based
industries.
The attention of:
The Presidency of the Portuguese
Republic
The Portuguese Parliament
The European Parliament
The Portuguese Government
The European Commission
October 17, 2013
The Portuguese pulp and paper industry: myths and reality.
The Portuguese paper
industry holds some myths, frequently advertised by some opinion makers. Are such
myths real?
1.
The weight of the paper industry
in the national economy and, in particular, in the exports, has been the most common
belief lately.
If, on one hand, it
highlights the contribution of the paper industry in the economy, on the other
there is a sharp decrease in the weight of all the forest-based industries in
the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) - which was already in decline over the last
decade. The weight of the forest-based industries in GDP was 2.2% in 2000 and
in 2010 it was only 1.3%. The advertised weight of 3.0% of GDP in the forest
sector (forest + forest-based industries) for 2000 is reduced in 2010 for only
1.8%.
The importance of the forest-based
industry in the exports gross value corresponds to the increased weight of
imports of wood. Part of those Imports comes from countries with dubious
management rules on their natural resources.
The
increase of business profitability on the forest-based industry has been joined
by a sharp decline in the forestry business; with the business risk transfer to
hundreds of thousands of private forest owners engaged in the roundwood
production (families and rural communities hold 92% of the forest areas in
Portugal, 60% of farms have less than 5 hectares). At the end of the chain, the
risk is supported by the Society. The lack of business expectations in the
forests leads to the absence of forest management. The absence of forest
management has serious consequences on forest fires, with devastating effects
on the statistics of burned forest areas. The Society annually supports high
economic costs and huge environmental and social impacts caused by forest fires
in Portugal.
Currently, the domestic pulp
and paper industry has a very poor auto supplying capacity; rounding 20% (around
16% is Group Portucel Soporcel).
The presence of the pulp
and paper industry in the forest (the area of greatest business risk) is continuously
decreasing. Only in the last decade eucalyptus areas held by the pulp and paper
industry decreased more than 34 000 hectares. There seems to be a progressive
disinvestment in the forest and, consequently, a business risk transfer to the
hundreds of thousands of families that contribute to supply this industry.
2.
The excellence management awards are another myth.
For this
“excellence” in management evaluation, the unilateral imposition of the roundwood
prices to the forest owners has been contributed greatly. Such imposition by
the pulp and paper industry is protected by the State, in complete
contradiction to the principles of equity and healthy functioning of the markets.
The luxury of cogeneration profits, guaranteed
by the State, has constituted a favorable factor to a good performance management
result.
It’s also important to
notice that, in 2010 and 2011, Portucel achieved extraordinary overall revenues
of about 50 million Euros, generated by tax benefits granted by the State.
3.
The performance in innovation.
The area of eucalyptus in
Portugal has increased ten times in the last 50 years (currently the
fifth largest in the world), but the national average productivity is the same
today as it was previously registered in 1928. The pulp and paper industry had
invested in R&D in the past, but currently it has almost abandoned this
area, focusing on the quantity instead of quality. However, the risks of quantity
production have been assumed by the Society.
After all, everything
suggests that the myths associated to the pulp and paper industry in Portugal
are nothing but myths. In fact, successive governments have protected the
economic interests of shareholders, and its headquarters fiscally addressed in
the Netherlands. This state protection is performed on the detriment of
families, forests and Territory.
Surely, this is not the
type of investment and unsustainable extraction Acréscimo advocates for forest
areas and the forest-based industry in Portugal.
Acréscimo is a
non-governmental organization that promotes sustainable and socially
responsible forest investment. The association is seriously concerned about the
high risk of forest fires related to this investment as well as the
responsibilities of forest-based industry in promoting this risk (with the complicity
of the state) besides a healthy and competitive functioning of markets.
October 8, 2013
Forest certification and the application of sludge from pulp and paper mills in forestry
Acréscimo is a Portuguese non-governmental
organization which aims to promote sustainable and responsible investments in forests
and uncultivated areas. The association has been communicating, in several
media resources, its concerns related to the need to increase the credibility of
forest certification among the population. This organization believes that the
certified entities, especially the industrial companies that manage forest
areas, have a decisive contribution to this objective.
The recent suspension of certificates
issued under the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) in Portugal is our main
concern as it corresponds to a very significant part of the Portuguese forest
area certified by this scheme. Besides that, we also face the weakly regulated
and supervised actions of industrial waste recovery through forestry
fertilization programs, specifically the use of sludge from pulp and paper
mills.
Pulp and paper industry, in the course of
their activity, is responsible for producing a large amount of waste (estimated
at approximately 48 tons per 100 tons of pulp produced) or inorganic (ashes,
dregs and grits), or organics (sludge) and other sub products. The application
of pulp and paper mills sludge on forest soil fertilization emerges as an
alternative method of disposing of industrial waste. However, the
application of sewage sludge should only be made after a detailed study of
its composition and after a proper characterization of the area for its
application.
The Portuguese legal framework for the
application of sludge in soils results from the implementation of the 1986 EU
Sludge Directive (86/27/EEC). The law imposes the obligation to carry out
frequent testing on the sludge or mixture of sludge, and on the soil and the water
on the places where they are to be spread and incorporated. It imposes limits
to the concentrations of heavy metals, organic compounds, dioxins and micro-organisms.
It also determines the cases of prohibition in the application of sewage sludge,
among others , injecting sludge in soils without agronomic value, burying
sludge in soils (other than landfill), apply near water lines and its uptake,
or adverse weather conditions ( between November and January, unless otherwise
justified). The cellulosic sludge should be spread and incorporated into the
soil within 48 hours of its extraction, using the appropriate means/action to
ensure a proper soil surface mobilization.
The sludge producer, even if their
forestry application occurs on lands of others, will always be co-responsible
for possible harmful effects of its application in soil or anywhere else.
With an annual growth estimated at 25% for the paper industry, the
production of sludge is projected to increase between 48 and 86%.
It is noted that concerns
about the legal requirements for use of sludge and ashes in forest soils, are
based on claims submitted to the competent National Authorities, involving
Portucel Soporcel company that owns about 122.000 hectares of certified forest,
ie more than 50% of the FSC certified forest area in Portugal.
Application
of sludge from pulp and paper mills in eucalyptus forest without soil incorporation.
Therefore, it is important to clarify that the extent of a procedure of
organic fertilization on forest soils is not conditioned by the growing need
for disposal of industrial waste, with corresponding adverse effects especially
for rural populations and habitats.
Acréscimo suggests the opening of these forested areas to the public visitation
and experts’ evaluation.
January 11, 2013
Portuguese forests in numbers: a worrisome vision.
Over the last decades, the economic value of
forests in Portugal has know a progressive decline, with several consequences on social and
environmental levels.
Since 1996, it was diagnosed (Poyry, BPI, Agro.ges)
that forests in Portugal have shown clear evidence of underutilization and over-exploitation. This diagnosis has worsened year after year.
At the current moment of crisis, the financial value of
exports appears to be the more relevant factor for the government and for the
economic analysts, however there is great concern about its impact on the degradation
of natural resources that, though renewables, need measures to ensure their
sustainability, both from an environmental and social, but also economic standpoint.
The current figures related to the forests and forestry
in Portugal, based on the official statistics and credible sources, are
worrisome:
67% represents
the decrease in the weight of the Gross Value Added (GVA) of forestry in
national GVA, i.e., 1.2% in 1990 fell to 0.4% in 2010.
(Source: Statistics Portugal, 2012) |
|
40% reflects
the reduction of the impact of the forest cluster on the Gross Domestic Product
(GDP) from 2000 (3%) to 2010 (1.8%).
(Source: GPP - Office for Planning and Policy, Ministry of Agriculture, 2012). |
|
1.500.000 hectares is the
estimated area of abandoned soils in Portugal. This area corresponds to 43% of the total
forest surface and to 17% of the national land area.
(source. Secretary of State for Forests and Rural Development, 2012) |
|
1.500.000 hectares correspond
to the burned forest area accumulated over the last decade (2002/2012). This
cumulative area corresponds to 43% of the total forest area in Portugal and 17%
of the national land area.
(Source: ICNF - Institute for Conservation of Nature and Forestry, 2012) |
|
74.200.000 Euros correspond
to the amount spent on direct combat of forest fires in 2012, 10.3% more than
the amount spent in 2011.
(source: ANPC - National Authority for Civil Protection, 2012). |
|
1.000.000.000 Euros/year is the
estimated cost of forest fires in Portugal, both on economy and environmental
perspectives
(Manifesto for Forest against crisis, 2012). |
|
2.400.000 tons of CO2 eq were emitted to the
atmosphere in the last decade, according to PCS (a Portuguese think tank), as a
result of forest fires.
(PCS Report, 2012). However, scientific studies estimate values 10 times higher than those reported by PCS. (www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/2625/2011/). |
|
5.700.000 oil
barrels is more than the equivalent
of that wasted with the forest fires in the last decade.
(PCS Report, 2012). |
|
35% was the
average percentage related to the distribution of burned forest area, recorded
by Portugal, between 2000 and 2009, compared to the set of 5 countries of
Southern Europe.
|
|
100%
|
|
700.000.000 Euros was the
amount of funding spent on support for forestation, for only one woody species,
over the past 20 years. This value could have boosted 350 thousand new hectares
of this species; however the same species lost around 400 thousand hectares
during this period. Could the public funds applied to support forestation have
boosted the "industry” of forest fires in Portugal?
|
|
16 years is the
period of time since the unanimous approval, in the Portuguese Parliament, of
the Law on Forest Policy, published in August 1996. However, after this period
the law has not yet been regulated in its core measures. The regulatory process
has already gone through the mandates of seven different ministers.
|
|
December 11, 2012
More “red” numbers related to forests and forestry in Portugal.
Over the last decades, the economic value of
forests in Portugal has known a progressive decline, with several consequences on social and
environmental levels.
Since 1996, it was diagnosed that forests in Portugal
showed clear evidence of underutilization and over-exploitation. This diagnosis has worsened year after year.
- 2,3% concerns to the decrease of the annual average change rate, in value, registered in forestry over the last decade (2000-2010), resulting from the lower prices paid out to forest owners (source: INE/CES 2010).
- 7,1% corresponds to the growth of the intermediate consumption/production ratio, shown in the last decade (2000/2010, 20.6% in 2000 to 27.7% in 2010), an adverse situation for forestry (source: INE/CES 2010),
- 1,5 million hectares is the estimated area of abandoned soils in Portugal. This area corresponds to 43% of total forest surface and to 17% of the national land area (source. Portuguese Government).
- 74,2 million Euros correspond to the amount spent on direct combat of forest fires in 2012, 10.3% more than the amount spent in 2011 (source: ANPC).
- 35% was the average percentage related to the distribution of forest burned area, recorded by Portugal, between 2000 and 2009, compared to the set of 5 countries of Southern Europe.
- 100% reflects the increase of eucalyptus area in the last 30 years. Data related to the last Forest Inventory are not yet available, however it is estimated that eucalyptus plantations in Portugal, which ranks fifth in the world, has increased by more than 400 thousand hectares. This positive evolution occurs in despite of the facts that the abandonment on eucalypt forests management is higher and the annual productivity average has experienced no changes since 1928 (currently is 10 cubic meters per hectare and year).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















